Most AI content talks about what AI can do. This article is for founders, and marketing leads who are using AI tools and wondering whether they still need a creative consultant; or whether AI has replaced that function. It’ll help them identify precisely what AI cannot do – and why that gap is where the value of a senior creative consultant lives.
The Doorman Fallacy: Why AI Makes the Wrong Creative Work Cheaper
There’s a concept in behavioural economics called the Doorman Fallacy.
The idea, articulated by strategist Rory Sutherland, goes like this: we systematically undervalue the person whose job looks simply and overvalue the work that looks complex. A doorman opens doors. How hard is that? So, we pay them less. But a doorman also remembers faces, reads situations, de-escalates tension, and decides in a split second who belongs in a building. That judgment — invisible, accumulated over years – is what we’re actually paying for. The door-opening is incidental.
AI has created a version of this fallacy at scale inside every creative industry.
The Strategic Implication
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
Viverra aliquet eget sit amet. At ultrices mi tempus imperdiet nulla. Arcu dui vivamus arcu felis bibendum ut. Arcu cursus euismod quis viverra nibh. Cursus vitae congue mauris rhoncus. Faucibus ornare suspendisse sed nisi lacus sed viverra.
John Doe
At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga.
The Strategic Implication
Here’s what this means for businesses and creative teams in 2026.
The model is not the competitive advantage. Everyone has access to the same underlying models. Claude, GPT-4, Gemini — they’re broadly accessible and broadly similar in capability. The competitive advantage is the harness.
The team that has built structured context, institutional memory, good templates, and clear orchestration pipelines will run circles around the team that opens a chat window and types prompts. Same model. Categorically different output.
This is especially true for creative professionals, where the value lives in accumulated knowledge — client relationships, market pattern recognition, design judgment, brand history — that currently lives in people’s heads. The harness is the mechanism for making that knowledge usable at speed.
Google’s engineers figured this out and wrote it into their internal guidance. The rest of us are still mostly building the 10%.
The opportunity — right now, before this becomes standard practice — is to build the harness.
